CVE-2003-0299: The IMAP Client, as used in mutt 1.4.1 and Balsa 2.0.10, allows remote malicious IMAP servers to cause a denia
CVE-2003-0299 is a high-severity flaw (CVSS 7.5) affecting mutt, balsa. Below: why it ranks where it does, which versions are affected, what to do, and the exact commands.
The IMAP Client, as used in mutt 1.4.1 and Balsa 2.0.10, allows remote malicious IMAP servers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via certain large mailbox size values that cause either integer signedness errors or integer overflow errors.
Why this priority
- High severity
No fix is published yet: follow the downgrade or mitigation steps.
Risk facts
| CVSS score | 7.5 (High) |
| EPSS exploit chance | 2.1% (top 18%) |
| CISA exploited list | No |
| Published | 2003-06-16 |
| Last modified | 2026-06-16 |
Last updated 2026-06-16 · Sources: CVE Program, NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS and vendor advisories · How we score
Am I affected?
Timeline
- Published CVE record published
- Updated Record last modified
Scores and fixes here are computed automatically from those and other public sources. Confirm with the vendor advisory before changing production systems.
Quick answers
How do I fix CVE-2003-0299?
mutt: downgrade or apply the listed mitigation; balsa: downgrade or apply the listed mitigation. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.
Is CVE-2003-0299 being exploited?
CVE-2003-0299 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.
What does CVE-2003-0299 affect?
CVE-2003-0299 affects mutt, balsa. Severity is high (CVSS 7.5). The IMAP Client, as used in mutt 1.4.1 and Balsa 2.0.10, allows remote malicious IMAP servers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via certain large mailbox size values that cause either integer signedness errors
How urgent is CVE-2003-0299?
Priority 47/100. High severity
Related CVEs
- CVE-2024-49395 MEDIUM 5.3 MITIGATE MITIGATE In mutt and neomutt, PGP encryption does not use the --hidden-recipient mode which may leak the Bcc email head
- CVE-2024-49394 MEDIUM 5.3 MITIGATE MITIGATE In mutt and neomutt the In-Reply-To email header field is not protected by cryptographic signing which allows
- CVE-2024-49393 MEDIUM 6.5 MITIGATE MITIGATE In neomutt and mutt, the To and Cc email headers are not validated by cryptographic signing which allows an at
- CVE-2023-4875 LOW 2.2 UPGRADE MITIGATE Null pointer dereference when composing from a specially crafted draft message in Mutt >1.5.2 <2.2.12
- CVE-2023-4874 MEDIUM 4.3 UPGRADE MITIGATE Null pointer dereference when viewing a specially crafted email in Mutt >1.5.2 <2.2.12