CVE-2005-4418: util-vserver before 0.30.208-1 with kernel-patch-vserver before 1.9.5.5 and 2.x before 2.3 for Debian GNU/Linu
CVE-2005-4418 is a high-severity flaw (CVSS 7.5) affecting util-vserver. Below: why it ranks where it does, which versions are affected, what to do, and the exact commands.
util-vserver before 0.30.208-1 with kernel-patch-vserver before 1.9.5.5 and 2.x before 2.3 for Debian GNU/Linux sets a default policy that trusts unknown capabilities, which could allow local users to conduct unauthorized activities.
Why this priority
- High severity
- On your watchlist
No fix is published yet: follow the downgrade or mitigation steps.
Risk facts
| CVSS score | 7.5 (High) |
| EPSS exploit chance | 1.8% (top 21%) |
| CISA exploited list | No |
| Published | 2005-12-31 |
| Last modified | 2026-06-16 |
Last updated 2026-06-16 · Sources: CVE Program, NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS and vendor advisories · How we score
Am I affected?
Timeline
- Published CVE record published
- Updated Record last modified
Scores and fixes here are computed automatically from those and other public sources. Confirm with the vendor advisory before changing production systems.
Quick answers
How do I fix CVE-2005-4418?
util-vserver: downgrade or apply the listed mitigation. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.
Is CVE-2005-4418 being exploited?
CVE-2005-4418 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.
What does CVE-2005-4418 affect?
CVE-2005-4418 affects util-vserver. Severity is high (CVSS 7.5). util-vserver before 0.30.208-1 with kernel-patch-vserver before 1.9.5.5 and 2.x before 2.3 for Debian GNU/Linux sets a default policy that trusts unknown capabilities, which could allow local users to conduct unauthorized activities.
How urgent is CVE-2005-4418?
Priority 51/100. High severity; On your watchlist
Software pages
Related CVEs
- CVE-2006-1656 HIGH 7.2 UPGRADE vserver in util-vserver 0.30.209 executes a command as root when the suexec userid parameter is invalid and no