CVE-2013-4426: pyxtrlock before 0.1 uses an incorrect variable name, which allows physically proximate attackers to bypass th
CVE-2013-4426 is a low-severity flaw (CVSS 3.6) affecting pyxtrlock. Below: why it ranks where it does, which versions are affected, what to do, and the exact commands.
pyxtrlock before 0.1 uses an incorrect variable name, which allows physically proximate attackers to bypass the lock screen via multiple failed authentication attempts, which trigger a crash.
Why this priority
- No elevated risk signals yet
A fixed release or distro patch exists.
Risk facts
| CVSS score | 3.6 (Low) |
| EPSS exploit chance | 0.4% (top 67%) |
| CISA exploited list | No |
| Published | 2014-05-19 |
| Last modified | 2026-06-16 |
Last updated 2026-06-16 · Sources: CVE Program, NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS and vendor advisories · How we score
Am I affected?
Timeline
- Published CVE record published
- Updated Record last modified
Scores and fixes here are computed automatically from those and other public sources. Confirm with the vendor advisory before changing production systems.
Quick answers
How do I fix CVE-2013-4426?
pyxtrlock: upgrade to newer than 0.1. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.
Is CVE-2013-4426 being exploited?
CVE-2013-4426 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.
What does CVE-2013-4426 affect?
CVE-2013-4426 affects pyxtrlock. Severity is low (CVSS 3.6). pyxtrlock before 0.1 uses an incorrect variable name, which allows physically proximate attackers to bypass the lock screen via multiple failed authentication attempts, which trigger a crash.
How urgent is CVE-2013-4426?
Priority 21/100. No elevated risk signals yet.
Related CVEs
- CVE-2019-1010316 HIGH 7.8 UPGRADE pyxtrlock 0.3 and earlier is affected by: Incorrect Access Control
- CVE-2013-4427 LOW 2.1 UPGRADE pyxtrlock before 0.2 does not properly check the return values of the (1) xcb_grab_pointer and (2) xcb_grab_ke