CVE-2014-2900: wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 does not properly validate X.509 certificates with unknown critical extensions, wh
CVE-2014-2900 is a medium-severity flaw (CVSS 5.8) affecting cyassl. Below: why it ranks where it does, which versions are affected, what to do, and the exact commands.
wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 does not properly validate X.509 certificates with unknown critical extensions, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via crafted X.509 certificate.
Why this priority
- No elevated risk signals yet
A fixed release or distro patch exists.
Risk facts
| CVSS score | 5.8 (Medium) |
| EPSS exploit chance | 1.0% (top 38%) |
| CISA exploited list | No |
| Weakness | CWE-310 |
| Published | 2014-04-22 |
| Last modified | 2026-06-17 |
Last updated 2026-06-17 · Sources: CVE Program, NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS and vendor advisories · How we score
Am I affected?
Timeline
- Published CVE record published
- Updated Record last modified
Scores and fixes here are computed automatically from those and other public sources. Confirm with the vendor advisory before changing production systems.
Quick answers
How do I fix CVE-2014-2900?
cyassl: upgrade to newer than 2.9.0. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.
Is CVE-2014-2900 being exploited?
CVE-2014-2900 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.
What does CVE-2014-2900 affect?
CVE-2014-2900 affects cyassl. Severity is medium (CVSS 5.8). wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 does not properly validate X.509 certificates with unknown critical extensions, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via crafted X.509 certificate.
How urgent is CVE-2014-2900?
Priority 36/100. No elevated risk signals yet.
Software pages
Related CVEs
- CVE-2014-2899 MEDIUM 5.0 UPGRADE wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) vi
- CVE-2013-1623 MEDIUM 4.3 UPGRADE The TLS and DTLS implementations in wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.5.0 do not properly consider timing side-channel a