CVE-2025-3325: A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in iteaj iboot 物联网网关 1.1.3
CVE-2025-3325 is a medium-severity flaw (CVSS 4.3) affecting iboot. Below: why it ranks where it does, which versions are affected, what to do, and the exact commands.
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in iteaj iboot 物联网网关 1.1.3. This affects an unknown part of the file /core/admin/pwd of the component Admin Password Handler. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to improper access controls. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Why this priority
- Public exploit reference
No fix is published yet: follow the downgrade or mitigation steps.
Last updated 2026-06-17 · Sources: CVE Program, NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS and vendor advisories · How we score
Am I affected?
Timeline
- Published CVE record published
- Updated Record last modified
Scores and fixes here are computed automatically from those and other public sources. Confirm with the vendor advisory before changing production systems.
Quick answers
How do I fix CVE-2025-3325?
iboot: downgrade or apply the listed mitigation. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.
Is CVE-2025-3325 being exploited?
CVE-2025-3325 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.
What does CVE-2025-3325 affect?
CVE-2025-3325 affects iboot. Severity is medium (CVSS 4.3). A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in iteaj iboot 物联网网关 1.1.3. This affects an unknown part of the file /core/admin/pwd of the component Admin Password Handler. The manipulation of the argument ID leads to impro
How urgent is CVE-2025-3325?
Priority 29/100. Public exploit reference
Related CVEs
- CVE-2025-3327 LOW 3.5 DOWNGRADE A vulnerability was found in iteaj iboot 物联网网关 1.1.3 and classified as problematic
- CVE-2025-3326 LOW 3.5 DOWNGRADE A vulnerability has been found in iteaj iboot 物联网网关 1.1.3 and classified as problematic