CVE-2026-45257: The KTLS receive path decrypted each record in place, assuming that the mbufs holding received data were anony
CVE-2026-45257 is a high-severity flaw (CVSS 7.8) affecting freebsd. Below: why it ranks where it does, which versions are affected, what to do, and the exact commands.
The KTLS receive path decrypted each record in place, assuming that the mbufs holding received data were anonymous and safe to modify. This assumption does not hold for data placed on a socket by sendfile(2), which can reference file-backed memory directly through non-anonymous M_EXTPG pages or EXT_SFBUF mbufs. When the sender transmits such data over a loopback connection without enabling KTLS on the transmit side, the file-backed mbufs reach
Why this priority
- High severity
No fix is published yet: follow the downgrade or mitigation steps.
Risk facts
| CVSS score | 7.8 (High) |
| Attack vector | Local |
| Attack complexity | Low |
| Privileges needed | Low |
| User interaction | None |
| EPSS exploit chance | 0.2% (top 93%) |
| CISA exploited list | No |
| Weakness | CWE-123 |
| Published | 2026-06-26 |
| Last modified | 2026-06-27 |
Last updated 2026-06-27 · Sources: CVE Program, NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS and vendor advisories · How we score
Am I affected?
Timeline
- Published CVE record published
- Updated Record last modified
Scores and fixes here are computed automatically from those and other public sources. Confirm with the vendor advisory before changing production systems.
Quick answers
How do I fix CVE-2026-45257?
freebsd: mitigate or apply the listed mitigation. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.
Is CVE-2026-45257 being exploited?
CVE-2026-45257 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.
What does CVE-2026-45257 affect?
CVE-2026-45257 affects freebsd. Severity is high (CVSS 7.8). The KTLS receive path decrypted each record in place, assuming that the mbufs holding received data were anonymous and safe to modify. This assumption does not hold for data placed on a socket by sendfile(2), which can reference file-backe
How urgent is CVE-2026-45257?
Priority 29/100. High severity
Related CVEs
- CVE-2026-58082 CRITICAL 9.8 MITIGATE The ISO-2022 encoding module used a stack buffer sized to MB_LEN_MAX (6 bytes) for intermediate character outp
- CVE-2026-58081 CRITICAL 9.8 MITIGATE Several encoding modules, including HZ, UTF-7, VIQR, and ZW, did not properly check the size of the caller-sup
- CVE-2026-58085 HIGH 7.5 MITIGATE After dispatching a decrypt operation to OCF and receiving the result, the wg(4) driver failed to check whethe
- CVE-2026-58086 HIGH 8.1 MITIGATE As an inadvertent side effect of an unrelated code change, PRIV_KTRACE was always denied to a jailed root user
- CVE-2026-58083 HIGH 8.4 MITIGATE While the kernel was copying knotes during fork, a knote with a timer-based filter could fire and be enqueued