CVE-2026-49422: The RACK setsockopt(2) handler drops the connection lock in order to copy option data from userspace, then rea
CVE-2026-49422 is a high-severity flaw (CVSS 8.4) affecting freebsd. Below: why it ranks where it does, which versions are affected, what to do, and the exact commands.
The RACK setsockopt(2) handler drops the connection lock in order to copy option data from userspace, then reacquires the lock. After reacquiring, it verifies that the TCP stack had not been switched away, but did not reload its pointer to the stack's per-connection control block. If userspace switches stacks twice during this window, the check will succeed but the saved pointer will refer to freed memory. The bug may be exploitable by an unpr
Why this priority
- High severity
No fix is published yet: follow the downgrade or mitigation steps.
Risk facts
| CVSS score | 8.4 (High) |
| Attack vector | Local |
| Attack complexity | Low |
| Privileges needed | None |
| User interaction | None |
| EPSS exploit chance | 0.2% (top 94%) |
| CISA exploited list | No |
| Weakness | CWE-416 |
| Published | 2026-08-19 |
| Last modified | 2026-09-01 |
Last updated 2026-09-01 · Sources: CVE Program, NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS and vendor advisories · How we score
Am I affected?
Timeline
- Published CVE record published
- Updated Record last modified
Scores and fixes here are computed automatically from those and other public sources. Confirm with the vendor advisory before changing production systems.
Quick answers
How do I fix CVE-2026-49422?
freebsd: mitigate or apply the listed mitigation. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.
Is CVE-2026-49422 being exploited?
CVE-2026-49422 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.
What does CVE-2026-49422 affect?
CVE-2026-49422 affects freebsd. Severity is high (CVSS 8.4). The RACK setsockopt(2) handler drops the connection lock in order to copy option data from userspace, then reacquires the lock. After reacquiring, it verifies that the TCP stack had not been switched away, but did not reload its pointer to
How urgent is CVE-2026-49422?
Priority 31/100. High severity
Related CVEs
- CVE-2026-101304 HIGH 7.1 MITIGATE When fdescfs(4) was mounted in a jail with the "nodup" option, opening /dev/fd/N returned a descriptor that di
- CVE-2026-101307 CRITICAL 9.1 MITIGATE When the PCM sample array needs to grow, the RACK stack doubles a 16-bit allocation counter
- CVE-2026-101306 CRITICAL 9.8 MITIGATE SCM_RIGHTS file descriptor passing did not preserve FD_RESOLVE_BENEATH when a descriptor was transferred
- CVE-2026-101305 HIGH 8.8 MITIGATE renameat(2) did not enforce FD_RESOLVE_BENEATH on its directory arguments
- CVE-2026-101303 HIGH 7.5 MITIGATE The IPv6 UDP send path for unconnected sockets did not apply the jail policy of rewriting a loopback destinati