CVE-2026-6682: In FatFS R0.16 and earlier contains a FAT32 integer overflow bug in mount_volume() where fasize *= fs->n_fats

Q: How do I fix CVE-2026-6682?

fatfs: upgrade to newer than r0.16. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.

Q: Is CVE-2026-6682 being exploited?

CVE-2026-6682 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.

Q: What does CVE-2026-6682 affect?

CVE-2026-6682 affects fatfs. Severity is high (CVSS 7.6). In FatFS R0.16 and earlier contains a FAT32 integer overflow bug in mount_volume() where fasize *= fs->n_fats can wrap, leading to attacker-controlled file-size metadata and unsafe read lengths in downstream callers. This maps to CWE-190 (I

Routine

HIGH 7.6UPGRADE

CVE-2026-6682 is a high-severity flaw (CVSS 7.6) affecting fatfs. Below: why it ranks where it does, which versions are affected, what to do, and the exact commands.

In FatFS R0.16 and earlier contains a FAT32 integer overflow bug in mount_volume() where fasize *= fs->n_fats can wrap, leading to attacker-controlled file-size metadata and unsafe read lengths in downstream callers. This maps to CWE-190 (Integer Overflow or Wraparound). Estimated CVSS v3.1 vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (7.6, High). Remote delivery is also possible in OTA/update pipelines. The estimated CISA SSVC vectors ar

Why this priority

High severity
Public exploit reference

A fixed release or distro patch exists.

Risk facts

CVSS score	7.6 (High)
Attack vector	Physical
Attack complexity	Low
Privileges needed	None
User interaction	None
EPSS exploit chance	0.3% (top 75%)
CISA exploited list	No
Weakness	CWE-190
Published	2026-07-01
Last modified	2026-10-25

Publisher (CNA): runZero · Vendor: elm-chan

Last updated 2026-10-25 · Sources: CVE Program, NVD, CISA KEV, EPSS and vendor advisories · How we score

Am I affected?

Timeline

2026-07-01 15:17 UTCPublished CVE record published
2026-10-25 17:10 UTCUpdated Record last modified

elm-chan fatfs UPGRADE

Affected: <= r0.16

Fixed in: newer than r0.16

Safe to downgrade to: no unaffected older release

1. Check installed version

apt-cache policy fatfs || rpm -q fatfs || fatfs --version

2. UPGRADE to newer than r0.16 (Debian / Ubuntu)

sudo apt update && sudo apt install --only-upgrade fatfs

2. UPGRADE (RHEL / Amazon Linux / Fedora)

sudo dnf upgrade fatfs

Note

Distros often backport fixes without changing the version number. Confirm with the distro advisory or changelog.

Verify at the official source NVD · CVE Program · Report a problem with this page
Scores and fixes here are computed automatically from those and other public sources. Confirm with the vendor advisory before changing production systems.

Quick answers

How do I fix CVE-2026-6682?

fatfs: upgrade to newer than r0.16. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.

Is CVE-2026-6682 being exploited?

CVE-2026-6682 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.

What does CVE-2026-6682 affect?

CVE-2026-6682 affects fatfs. Severity is high (CVSS 7.6). In FatFS R0.16 and earlier contains a FAT32 integer overflow bug in mount_volume() where fasize *= fs->n_fats can wrap, leading to attacker-controlled file-size metadata and unsafe read lengths in downstream callers. This maps to CWE-190 (I

How urgent is CVE-2026-6682?

Priority 38/100. High severity; Public exploit reference

Related CVEs

CVE-2026-6687 HIGH 7.6 UPGRADE FatFs R0.16 and earlier contains a stack overflow bug in f_getlabel() because exFAT label length (XDIR_NumLabe
CVE-2026-6688 HIGH 7.6 UPGRADE FatFs R0.16 and earlier contains a downstream-caller vulnerability pattern associated with FatFs long filename
CVE-2026-6683 MEDIUM 4.6 UPGRADE FatFs R0.16 and earlier contains a divide-by-zero in exFAT sync logic bug when crafted metadata causes n_faten
CVE-2026-6684 MEDIUM 4.6 UPGRADE FatFs prior to R0.16 that use GPT scanning with 'FF_LBA64 = 1' contains an issue where an unbounded loop count
CVE-2026-6686 MEDIUM 4.6 UPGRADE FatFs R0.16 and earlier contains an uninitialized cluster exposure when f_lseek() extends files beyond EOF wit

References

← Back to latest CVEs