<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../assets/feed.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>PatchTheCVE: di-524</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/</link><description>CVEs with upgrade or downgrade fix steps</description><item><title>CVE-2008-1266: Multiple buffer overflows in the web interface on the D-Link DI-524 router allow remote attackers to cause a d</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2008-1266.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2008-1266.html</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.8: Multiple buffer overflows in the web interface on the D-Link DI-524 router allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via (1) a long username or (2) an HTTP header with a large name and an empty value.</description></item><item><title>CVE-2006-3687: Stack-based buffer overflow in the Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) service in D-Link DI-524, DI-604 Broadband R</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2006-3687.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2006-3687.html</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 22:27:33 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Stack-based buffer overflow in the Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) service in D-Link DI-524, DI-604 Broadband Router, DI-624, D-Link DI-784, WBR-1310 Wireless G Router, WBR-2310 RangeBooster G Router, and EBR-2310 Ethernet Broadband Router allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long </description></item><item><title>CVE-2005-4723: D-Link DI-524 Wireless Router, DI-624 Wireless Router, and DI-784 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of </title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2005-4723.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2005-4723.html</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 22:19:18 +0000</pubDate><description>MEDIUM 5.0: D-Link DI-524 Wireless Router, DI-624 Wireless Router, and DI-784 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reboot) via a series of crafted fragmented UDP packets, possibly involving a missing fragment.</description></item></channel></rss>