<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../assets/feed.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>PatchTheCVE: openssl</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/</link><description>CVEs with upgrade or downgrade fix steps</description><item><title>CVE-2026-84784: Issue summary: A malicious remote peer may flood the local QUIC
stack with NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames by avoidin</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-84784.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-84784.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:21:22 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: A malicious remote peer may flood the local QUIC
stack with NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames by avoiding a limit check on
how many connection IDs the remote QUIC stack can use.

Impact summary: The local QUIC stack sends a RETIRE_CONN_ID frame
for every NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame it receives. Th</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-84783: Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by
several threads may cause its cached </title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-84783.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-84783.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:21:13 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by
several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while
another thread is still using it.

Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded
TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server tha</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-84782: Issue summary: The DTLS retransmission logic does not correctly handle
a handshake message write that is suspe</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-84782.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-84782.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:20:56 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 8.2: Issue summary: The DTLS retransmission logic does not correctly handle
a handshake message write that is suspended part-way through.
The retransmitted message can be read past the message buffer and
the retransmission overwrites the internal state the suspended write
needs to resume correctly.

Impa</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-77696: Issue summary: SM2 signature generation uses non-constant-time arithmetic
on secret values, forming a timing s</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-77696.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-77696.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:20:41 +0000</pubDate><description>LOW 3.7: Issue summary: SM2 signature generation uses non-constant-time arithmetic
on secret values, forming a timing side-channel.

Impact summary: An attacker able to measure SM2 signing times may learn
information about the per-signature secret nonce, which over many signatures
can, via a lattice / Hidden</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-75806: Issue summary: An established DTLS 1.2 association using an AEAD cipher suite
can be terminated by a single un</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-75806.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-75806.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:20:33 +0000</pubDate><description>MEDIUM 5.3: Issue summary: An established DTLS 1.2 association using an AEAD cipher suite
can be terminated by a single unauthenticated datagram whose encrypted
fragment is shorter than the mandatory explicit IV and authentication tag
overhead.

Impact summary: An attacker who can send a datagram that is routed</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-75805: Issue summary: A CMP client that requests certificate revocation on the basis
of a PKCS#10 CSR may dereference</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-75805.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-75805.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:20:24 +0000</pubDate><description>MEDIUM 5.3: Issue summary: A CMP client that requests certificate revocation on the basis
of a PKCS#10 CSR may dereference a NULL pointer and terminate abnormally when
processing a crafted revocation response. 

Impact summary: The NULL pointer dereference happens on a read which 
leads to a crash and a Denial </description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-75804: Issue summary: OpenSSL QUIC stack does not enforce connection
level flow control for streams</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-75804.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-75804.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:20:01 +0000</pubDate><description>MEDIUM 5.3: Issue summary: OpenSSL QUIC stack does not enforce connection
level flow control for streams. Remote peers may send more bytes
as long as they fit within the stream flow control limits.

Impact summary: A malicious remote peer may exploit the lack of connection
flow control for streams to make the Q</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-72897: Issue summary: A TLS server that calls SSL_set_SSL_CTX() to switch a
connection to a different SSL_CTX part wa</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-72897.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-72897.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:19:41 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: A TLS server that calls SSL_set_SSL_CTX() to switch a
connection to a different SSL_CTX part way through a handshake may access
memory beyond the end of an internal array if the replacement context knows
about more provider signature algorithms than the context the connection was
crea</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-54875: Issue summary: A non-constant-time optimized implementation of scalar
point multiplication is used for SM2 pri</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-54875.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-54875.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:19:29 +0000</pubDate><description>LOW 3.7: Issue summary: A non-constant-time optimized implementation of scalar
point multiplication is used for SM2 private key operations on ARM64 and
RISC-V platforms.

Impact summary: An attacker able to measure the time taken by, or to observe
the cache-line access pattern of SM2 signing or decryption on</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-54873: Issue summary: QUIC process may keep memory for QUIC packet
buffer for much longer period than necessary.

Imp</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-54873.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-54873.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:19:18 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: QUIC process may keep memory for QUIC packet
buffer for much longer period than necessary.

Impact summary: Remote peer can exploit this vulnerability
by sending maliciously crafted packets, making the local
QUIC stack to keep the memory for packet buffers allocated.
The time for whic</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-54872: Issue summary: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for
ECDSA and SM2 signature operations wi</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-54872.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-54872.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:19:04 +0000</pubDate><description>LOW 3.7: Issue summary: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for
ECDSA and SM2 signature operations with curves that do not have a dedicated
implementation leaks information about the secret nonce through timing.

Impact summary: An attacker able to measure signing times may learn
informatio</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-42772: Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates
progressively as packets are arri</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-42772.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-42772.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:18:57 +0000</pubDate><description>MEDIUM 5.3: Issue summary: The QUIC stream reassembly algorithm performance deteriorates
progressively as packets are arriving out of order. The worst case has
a quadratic complexity proportional to the number of stream frames kept in
the buffer for the received stream data.

Impact summary: A remote QUIC peer </description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-35191: Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address
validation, can be forced to co</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-35191.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-35191.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:02:06 +0000</pubDate><description>LOW 3.7: Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address
validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its
unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000
unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data
rec</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-35189: Issue summary: A certificate with many nameRelativeToCRLIssuer CRL
distribution points causes disproportionate</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-35189.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-35189.html</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 01:01:54 +0000</pubDate><description>MEDIUM 5.3: Issue summary: A certificate with many nameRelativeToCRLIssuer CRL
distribution points causes disproportionate heap growth when OpenSSL caches
X.509 extensions.

Impact summary: Receiving a crafted certificate from a malicious peer can lead
to significant memory pressure and possible Denial of Servi</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-75803: Issue summary: ChaCha20-Poly1305 and AES-OCB decryption with an empty
ciphertext can report success without ve</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-75803.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-75803.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:17:17 +0000</pubDate><description>CRITICAL 9.1: Issue summary: ChaCha20-Poly1305 and AES-OCB decryption with an empty
ciphertext can report success without verifying the supplied authentication
tag when the operation is finalized by calling the EVP_Cipher() function.

Impact summary: Applications calling EVP_Cipher() on an empty ciphertext and
ex</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-63076: Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only
checks whether the protectionAlg parame</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63076.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63076.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:17:12 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only
checks whether the protectionAlg parameter was not NULL and not its
ASN.1 type, before treating it as a PBMParameter. A crafted message can
contain a parameter of a different type, which is then dereferenced as an
invalid pointer</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-63075: Issue summary: When OpenSSL processes QUIC traffic from a peer that repeatedly
sends ack-eliciting packets whi</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63075.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63075.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:17:05 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: When OpenSSL processes QUIC traffic from a peer that repeatedly
sends ack-eliciting packets while not acknowledging ACK-only responses, the
QUIC stack can retain ACK-only packet metadata for the lifetime of the
connection.

Impact summary: A remote peer that can complete a QUIC handsh</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-63074: Issue summary: The OpenSSL Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) caches
additional certificates (extraCerts) s</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63074.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63074.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:16:58 +0000</pubDate><description>MEDIUM 5.9: Issue summary: The OpenSSL Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) caches
additional certificates (extraCerts) sent in a CMP message, but never expunges
them (for instance if they are invalid).  If a server reuses an OSSL_CMP_CTX
frequently, this cache of extraCerts may grow unboundedly, and a malicio</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-63073: Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directl</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63073.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63073.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:16:45 +0000</pubDate><description>CRITICAL 9.8: Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`.

Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client
that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certifi</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-63072: Issue summary: OpenSSL CMS decryption sizes the key-unwrap output buffer based
on querying the unwrapped key s</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63072.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-63072.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:16:34 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: OpenSSL CMS decryption sizes the key-unwrap output buffer based
on querying the unwrapped key size, but the AES-WRAP-PAD unwrap primitive
can write and cleanse more bytes than that query reports, causing an 8-byte
out-of-bounds heap write.

Impact summary: An attacker who supplies a c</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-54874: Issue summary: Receiving a DTLS record for a future epoch while a handshake
is in progress causes OpenSSL to b</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-54874.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-54874.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: Receiving a DTLS record for a future epoch while a handshake
is in progress causes OpenSSL to buffer far more memory than the record
itself requires.

Impact summary: A peer can use a small amount of network traffic to make an
OpenSSL DTLS endpoint retain a disproportionately large am</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-18798: Issue summary: QUIC server may double free QRX (QUIC record layer RX) object
when channel creation fails for i</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-18798.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-18798.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 16:07:09 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: QUIC server may double free QRX (QUIC record layer RX) object
when channel creation fails for initial packet.

Impact summary: Double free leads to heap corruption, which typically results in 
termination of QUIC server process, leading to Denial of Service. There is so
far no evidenc</description></item><item><title>CVE-2026-14457: Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)
enabled, and only the p</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-14457.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2026-14457.html</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:14:35 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 7.5: Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)
enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally,
a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and
also sends the typically omitted &quot;signa</description></item></channel></rss>