<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../assets/feed.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>PatchTheCVE: conduit</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/</link><description>CVEs with upgrade or downgrade fix steps</description><item><title>CVE-2024-6303: Missing authorization in Client-Server API in Conduit &lt;=0.7.0, allowing for any alias to be removed and added </title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6303.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6303.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:17:44 +0000</pubDate><description>CRITICAL 9.9: Missing authorization in Client-Server API in Conduit &lt;=0.7.0, allowing for any alias to be removed and added to another room, which can be used for privilege escalation by moving the #admins alias to a room which they control, allowing them to run commands resetting passwords, siging json with the </description></item><item><title>CVE-2024-6302: Lack of privilege checking when processing a redaction in Conduit versions v0.6.0 and lower, allowing a local </title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6302.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6302.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:17:44 +0000</pubDate><description>HIGH 8.1: Lack of privilege checking when processing a redaction in Conduit versions v0.6.0 and lower, allowing a local user to redact any message from users on the same server, given that they are able to send redaction events.</description></item><item><title>CVE-2024-6301: Lack of validation of origin in federation API in Conduit, allowing any remote server to impersonate any user </title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6301.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6301.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:17:44 +0000</pubDate><description>MEDIUM 5.3: Lack of validation of origin in federation API in Conduit, allowing any remote server to impersonate any user from any server in most EDUs</description></item><item><title>CVE-2024-6300: Incomplete cleanup when performing redactions in Conduit, allowing an attacker to check whether certain string</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6300.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6300.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:17:44 +0000</pubDate><description>LOW 3.7: Incomplete cleanup when performing redactions in Conduit, allowing an attacker to check whether certain strings were present in the PDU before redaction</description></item><item><title>CVE-2024-6299: Lack of consideration of key expiry when validating signatures in Conduit, allowing an attacker which has comp</title><link>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6299.html</link><guid>https://patchthecve.com/cve/CVE-2024-6299.html</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:17:44 +0000</pubDate><description>MEDIUM 4.8: Lack of consideration of key expiry when validating signatures in Conduit, allowing an attacker which has compromised an expired key to forge requests as the remote server, as well as PDUs with timestamps past the expiry date</description></item></channel></rss>