CVE-2026-14682: In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Possible OOM from unbounded up-front allocation on a definite-length re
42
This month
HIGH 7.5REMOTEUPGRADEUPGRADEUPGRADE
CVE-2026-14682 is a high-severity flaw (CVSS 7.5) affecting bc-java, bctls-fips, bouncy castle for java lts. Below: why it ranks where it does, which versions are affected, what to do, and the exact commands.
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Possible OOM from unbounded up-front allocation on a definite-length read. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series), and before bctls-fips 1.0.24.
Downgrading can break dependent software and may reopen older bugs. Read the distro advisory first and test on a non-production host.
After downgrade
Restart the service, and keep the package held until a fixed release ships.
Verify at the official sourceNVD · CVE Program · Report a problem with this page Scores and fixes here are computed automatically from those and other public sources. Confirm with the vendor advisory before changing production systems.
Quick answers
How do I fix CVE-2026-14682?
bc-java: upgrade to 1.85; bctls-fips: upgrade to 1.0.24; bouncy castle for java lts: upgrade to newer than 2.73.11. Exact commands for each OS are on this page.
Is CVE-2026-14682 being exploited?
CVE-2026-14682 is not on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list at the time of the last update. Check again, as this can change.
What does CVE-2026-14682 affect?
CVE-2026-14682 affects bc-java, bctls-fips, bouncy castle for java lts. Severity is high (CVSS 7.5). In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, Possible OOM from unbounded up-front allocation on a definite-length read. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0
How urgent is CVE-2026-14682?
Priority 42/100. High severity; Remotely exploitable, no login, no user action